[openstack-dev] [OSLO] DB Support

Davanum Srinivas davanum at gmail.com
Sun May 19 20:45:43 UTC 2013


Gary,

please see this review for allowing multiple sets of name/groups to be
deprecated. I need @markmc and others to bless this approach.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29722/

Thanks for your patience :)

-- dims

On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Gary Kotton <gkotton at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/18/2013 06:57 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>
>> Gary,
>>
>> We are at a stalemate between your -1 and Dolph Mathews's -1 on what
>> the naming of the group in session.py [1]
>
>
> I'd say that we are between a rock and a hard place :)
>
> Below is a partial mapping on how the projects have the section and key
> names for the SQL database:
>
> Nova: Section - DEFAULT; Key - sql_connection
> Cinder: Section - DEFAULT; Key - sql_connection
> Glance: Section - DEFAULT; Key - sql_connection
> Quantum: Section - DATABASE; key - sql_connection
> Keystone: Section - SQL; key - connection
>
> My concern is the upgrade process and being backward compatible to the
> existing configuration. The code that you have done works great for Nova,
> Cinder and Glance. Problem is that it does not work for Quantum and
> Keystone.
>
> Is there anyway of ensuring that the Quantum and Keystone configurations are
> also supported. I am not sure that the common configuration module supports
> more than one deprecated section and key name. If so great.
>
> I am really impartial to the section name. I prefer database but can be
> easily swayed as it is not something that is written in stone. But What I
> really do think is important is that we do not break things when going from
> Grizzly to Havana.
>
> Thanks
> Gary
>
>
>> So throwing it out where...what should it be? "database" or
>> "sqlalchemy"? We need to pick one and i'll change the review
>>
>> thanks,
>> dims
>>
>> [1]
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27345/9/openstack/common/db/sqlalchemy/session.py,unified
>>
>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Gary Kotton<gkotton at redhat.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Any chance on getting a review for
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27345/.
>>> This is blocking the OSLO DB usage of Quantum. It would be nice to be
>>> able
>>> to get this in by H-1.
>>> Thanks
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list