[openstack-dev] [Heat] Does it make sense to have a resource-create API?

Robert Collins robertc at robertcollins.net
Wed Jun 19 07:12:40 UTC 2013


On 19 June 2013 16:01, Adrian Otto <adrian.otto at rackspace.com> wrote:
> It's also useful for situations like rolling updates, for when a complete redeployment is not practical, affordable, or desirable. Think of this as the point of intersection between a configuration management system and the orchestration system. Yes, you can accomplish this with stack-update, but that could be rather awkward or impractical depending on the size of the stack/assembly. Imagine something with 2000 nodes in it… perhaps a large scale triple-o use case. Sometimes groupings are sufficient, and sometimes they are not.

s/large scale/ medium scale/. With products like
http://www8.hp.com/us/en/products/proliant-servers/product-detail.html?oid=5375897
you can get 900 cores, 4TB of memory, in 450 nodes... in a single
rack. 5 racks gets you 2000 nodes; a row in a datacentre is
substantially more than that :).

-Rob

-- 
Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Cloud Services



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list