[openstack-dev] RFC: Basic definition of OpenStack Programs and first batch
thierry at openstack.org
Tue Jul 2 09:32:05 UTC 2013
Thierry Carrez wrote:
> 'OpenStack Programs' are efforts which are essential to the completion
> of our mission. Programs can create any code repository and produce any
> deliverable they deem necessary to achieve their goals.
> Programs are placed under the oversight of the Technical Committee, and
> contributing to one of their code repositories grants you ATC status.
> Current efforts or teams which want to be recognized as an 'OpenStack
> Program' should place a request to the Technical Committee, including a
> clear mission statement describing how they help the OpenStack general
> mission and how that effort is essential to the completion of our
> mission. If programs have a goal that includes the production of
> a server 'integrated' deliverable, that specific project would still
> need to go through an Incubation period.
> The initial Programs are 'Nova', 'Swift', 'Cinder', 'Neutron',
> 'Horizon', 'Glance', 'Keystone', 'Heat', 'Ceilometer', 'Documentation',
> 'Infrastructure', 'QA' and 'Oslo'. 'Trove' and 'Ironic' are in
> incubation. Those programs should retroactively submit a mission
> statement and initial lead designation, if they don't have one already.
Oops. In this variant, Trove and Ironic, as programs, would not be "in
incubation" (only one of their deliverables would). That last paragraph
should be fixed as:
The initial Programs are 'Nova', 'Swift', 'Cinder', 'Neutron',
'Horizon', 'Glance', 'Keystone', 'Heat', 'Ceilometer', 'Documentation',
'Infrastructure', 'QA', 'Oslo', 'Trove' and 'Ironic'. Those programs
should retroactively submit a mission statement and initial lead
designation, if they don't have one already.
Maybe Ironic should be merged into the TripleO program when it's considered.
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
More information about the OpenStack-dev