[openstack-dev] VPNaaS

Nachi Ueno nachi at ntti3.com
Mon Jul 1 17:13:39 UTC 2013


Hi Taiana

Cooool!
Could you share the code on gerrit?

The first driver can be testable now
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Quantum/VPNaaS/HowToInstall
Could you add instruction to use your UI on this page?

Nice work!
Best
Nachi




2013/6/30 Tatiana Mazur <tmazur at mirantis.com>:
> Hello,
>
> I have finished the prototype of VPNaaS UI. The corresponding blueprint is
> here: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/vpnaas-ui. Since that's
> a prototype, the code will be polished and some features will be added later
> when dependencies are merged. Unit tests are also to be added. For now
> 'Create' and 'Delete' options are implemented for VPNService, IKEPolicy,
> IPSecPolicy and VPNConnection. 'Update' actions are to be added (I think
> I'll add them in a separate patch set in order not to overcomplicate this
> one).
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Tatiana
>
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Nachi Ueno <nachi at ntti3.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Llya
>>
>> Wow. Sounds Great!
>> Thank you for your contribution.
>>
>> Best
>> Nachi
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/5/15 Ilya Shakhat <ishakhat at mirantis.com>:
>> > Hi Nachi,
>> >
>> > Tatyana and me volunteer for work on UI for VPNaaS. The corresponding bp
>> > is
>> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/vpnaas-ui. We will start
>> > filling the specification soon.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Ilya
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/5/15 Nachi Ueno <nachi at ntti3.com>
>> >>
>> >> Hi Folks
>> >>
>> >> We had VPN meetings yesterday.
>> >>
>> >> Agenda :
>> >> 1.  local_subnet vs local_cidr  --> Keep discussion
>> >> 2.  Use cidr value or subnet_id?  --> Keep discussion
>> >> 3.  Task assignment
>> >>   -  move doc to wiki (Swami) Done
>> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Quantum/VPNaaS
>> >>   -  Register BP and get approval by Mark (Swami) Done -> H2
>> >>   -  check default value for lifetime value (Swami) Done
>> >>   -  Implement Data Model (Swami will push code to the gerrit) by 5/20
>> >>   -  CLI (python-quantum client) work (Swami will push code to the
>> >> gerrit) by 5/20
>> >>   -  Implement Driver (Nachi & PCM ) by 5/31
>> >>      - Investigate strongswan
>> >>      -  rpc (spec needed)
>> >>      - Design driver archtecutre (spec needed)
>> >>      - Write driver code
>> >>   - Instation instructions on Wiki 5/31
>> >>   -  Devstack support (nati) late June?
>> >>   -  Write openstack network api document wiki (Sachin)
>> >>   -  Horizon work (needs contributer)
>> >>   -  Tempest (needs contributer)
>> >>
>> >> Next meeting is 5/16 Thursday at 3pm (PST) . On IRC #openstack-meetings
>> >>
>> >> Meeting ended Tue May 14 01:00:58 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot
>> >> at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
>> >> Minutes:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_networking_vpn/2013/openstack_networking_vpn.2013-05-14-00.06.html
>> >> Minutes (text):
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_networking_vpn/2013/openstack_networking_vpn.2013-05-14-00.06.txt
>> >> Log:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_networking_vpn/2013/openstack_networking_vpn.2013-05-14-00.06.log.htm
>> >>
>> >> Thanks!
>> >> Nachi Ueno
>> >>
>> >> 2013/5/10 Nachi Ueno <nachi at ntti3.com>:
>> >> > Hi Paul
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for your contributions! :)
>> >> >
>> >> > Nachi
>> >> >
>> >> > 2013/5/10 Paul Michali <pcm at cisco.com>:
>> >> >> Sure! Glad to work with you Nachi. Anything I can do to help out on
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> project!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'll start looking at strongswan and how to configure.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> PCM (Paul Michali)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On May 10, 2013, at 12:35 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Paul
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sounds Great.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The first driver will be strong-swan based.
>> >> >> http://www.strongswan.org/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> How about work with me to implement strong-swan vpn driver?
>> >> >> Honestly, i'm new to strong-swan, so I'm very appreciate if you
>> >> >> could try strong-swan on ubuntu and share how to configure it based
>> >> >> on
>> >> >> current API model.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks
>> >> >> Nachi
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2013/5/10 Paul Michali <pcm at cisco.com>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Naci, Mark, Swami, Sachin, et al,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Any suggestions on where/how I can help on this? I'm new to OS (just
>> >> >> working
>> >> >>
>> >> >> it for a few months), so no specific expertise area, but have
>> >> >> bandwidth
>> >> >> to
>> >> >>
>> >> >> contribute.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Also, any pointers to information that will help me get up to speed
>> >> >> on
>> >> >> this
>> >> >>
>> >> >> would be appreciated (Mark gave me link to Amazon URL for info on
>> >> >> what
>> >> >> they
>> >> >>
>> >> >> provide for VPNaaS). I was going to look at LBaaS code next week and
>> >> >> have
>> >> >>
>> >> >> been monitoring those discussions, as there seem to be some
>> >> >> parallels
>> >> >> there.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If there are companion info that you think would help, let me know.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> PCM (Paul Michali)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On May 9, 2013, at 9:12 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Folks
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We have meeting about VPN today.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> #Conclusions
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1. We agreed ipsec api
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/vpnaas-python-apis
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2. Swami will push api CRUD code to review (continue discussion on
>> >> >> code)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/vpnaas-python-apis
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 3. We agreed first implementation vpn architecture
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 4. Next meeting is 5/13 PST 5:00 PM on #openstack-meetings
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> #Questions for IPSec API
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1 psk_key -> psk (agreed)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2 For ipsecpolicy table, suggest to split lifetime into two parts
>> >> >>
>> >> >> lifetime_s(per seconds) and lifetime_b(per kilobytes)   ->  updated
>> >> >>
>> >> >> table (agreed)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 3 change back "cidrs" from subnet (or network)  -> check marks's
>> >> >> thought
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 4 For APIs, can we shorten the naming such as change  -> keep
>> >> >> current
>> >> >>
>> >> >> longer style for reability
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> #Project Management (Task)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -  move doc to wiki (Swami)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -  Register BP and get approval by Mark (Swami)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -  check default value for lifetime value (Swami)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -  Discuss Archtecture
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -  Implement Data Model (Swami will push code to the gerrit)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -  Driver (Nachi?)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -  CLI (python-quantum client) work (Swami will push code to the
>> >> >> gerrit)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -  Write openstack network api document wiki (Sachin)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -  Devstack support
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -  Horizon work
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -  Tempest
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://docs.google.com/a/ntti3.com/presentation/d/1J7k1eI13-3pQVwp5XgZDWPfzUvuSqczRdK0lEZKQOKk/edit#slide=id.p
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Nachi
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2013/5/7 Qin Li <qili at vmware.com>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Swami,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks for your comments. All look good to me except local_cidrs,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> peer_cidrs. "cidrs" may be clear for value type and validation, but
>> >> >> it
>> >> >> is
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> unfamiliar for the existing VPN administrators. I think we might use
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> subnets or networks to avoid introducing a new concept for users.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> QinLi
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> From: Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [mailto:swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sent: 2013年5月8日 1:25
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] VPNaaS
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Qin Li,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> See my answers inline.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> From: Qin Li [mailto:qili at vmware.com]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 8:37 PM
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] [Networking] VPNaaS
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'd like to share some of my comments on data models, tables, APIs
>> >> >> defined
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> in link
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://docs.google.com/a/ntti3.com/document/d/1Jphcvnn7PKxqFEFFZQ1_PYkEx5
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> J4aO5J5Q74R_PwgV8/edit .
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1. For VPNServiceConnection table
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> a. suggest to remove psk(Boolean) key defined in
>> >> >> VPNServiceConnection
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> table. There is already key auth_mode defined in ikepolicy table.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "auth_mode" can be "psk" or "certificate". By default, if not set,
>> >> >> it
>> >> >> is
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> psk mode for authentication. Still keeping psk_key inside
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> VPNServiceConnection since psk_key is different per remote peer.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Authentication mode is a part of IKE property.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Swami - Yes we had both the auth_mode and psk_key as part of the
>> >> >> IKEPolicy
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> table.  We moved both the fields to the connection table since, we
>> >> >> just
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> wanted to re-use the IKEPolicy for different connections if only the
>> >> >> PSK
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> key changes or the auth_mode changes. Also in the document we make
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> necessary changes to the table definition, but I need to make the
>> >> >> change
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> also in the datamodel table.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> b. suggest to change local_cidrs and peer_cidrs to local_networks(or
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> local_subnets) and peer_networks(per_subnets) in
>> >> >> VPNServiceConnection
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> table.   Cidrs is not a familiar keyword to users in IPSec industry.
>> >> >> Some
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> IPSec VPN vendors use subnets, some use networks.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Swami - Yes we had initially defined it as peer_subnets and
>> >> >> local_subnets,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> but based on yesterday's discussion we moved it to "cidrs", since it
>> >> >> would
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> be clear.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> c. suggest to change psk_key to psk,  psk already means pre-shared
>> >> >> key.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Swami - Accepted we will change this.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2. For ipsecpolicy table, suggest to split lifetime into two parts
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> lifetime_s(per seconds) and lifetime_b(per kilobytes).
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Swami - Yes we can discuss about this in Thursday's meeting.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 3. Can we shorten the naming of keywords? Such as change
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Swami - We can discuss about this in Thursday's meeting. The reason
>> >> >> we
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> don't want to have abbreviated keys is for people to understand the
>> >> >> keys
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> properly.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  In vpnserviceconnections table
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  vpnservice_ipsecpolicy_id  to  ipsecpolicy_id
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  vpnservice_ikepolicy_id    to  ikepolicy_id
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  vpnservice_certificiate_id to  certificate_id
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  In ikepolicys table
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  auth_algorithm           to auth_alg
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  encryption_algorithm     to enc_alg
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  phraseI_negotiation_mode to phraseI_mode
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  In ipsecpolicys table
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  transform_protocol       to protocol
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  auth_algorithm           to auth_alg
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  encryption_algorithm     to enc_alg
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  encapsulation_mode       to mode or encap_mode
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 4. There might be some updates to set proper length for each value
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> the
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> tables. Such as change
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  auth_algorithm VARCHAR2(255)       to auth_alg  VARCHAR2(8)   ; for
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> example "sha1" etc.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  encryption_algorithm VARCHAR2(255) to enc_alg   VARCHAR2(16)   ;
>> >> >> for
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> example "aes128-cbc", "aes256-cbc" etc.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  name VARCHAR2(255)                 to name      VARCHAR2(64)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Swami - Yes we will make the necessary changes in the table.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 5. What do "dh" and "tls" keywords mean in table
>> >> >> vpnservicecertficates?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Swami - This was mainly included in the certificate table to address
>> >> >> the
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Openvpn" certificate requirements. This will be dropped for now.
>> >> >> Also
>> >> >> we
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> are not considering to implement the certificates for this release.
>> >> >> We
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> will clean up the tables.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 6. For APIs, can we shorten the naming such as change
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  /v1.0/vpnservicecertificates/vpnservice_certificate_id  to
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> /v1.0/vpncerts/certificate_id
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  /v1.0/vpnserviceconnections/vpnservice_conn_id          to
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> /v1.0/vpnsrvconns/conn_id
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Swami: We can discuss in Thursday's meeting.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks & Regards
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Qin
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> From: Nachi Ueno [mailto:nachi at ntti3.com]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sent: 2013年5月7日 9:07
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] [Networking] VPNaaS
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi folks
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In today's meeting, we are almost finished to define data models.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://docs.google.com/a/ntti3.com/document/d/1Jphcvnn7PKxqFEFFZQ1_PYkEx5
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> J4aO5J5Q74R_PwgV8/edit
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If you have any concerns, please commet it on the doc or question on
>> >> >> the
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> mailing list.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We will have meeting at
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 5/9 (Thu) 5:00 (PST)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In the next meeting, we will discuss more project management
>> >> >> oriented
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> discussion.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Nachi
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2013/5/6 Nachi Ueno <nachi at ntti3.com>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi folks
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here is note from the meeting at 2nd meeting on VPN # sorry I
>> >> >> thought
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have sent it to the mailing list, but it looks not delivery.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1) FirstStep  SSL-VPN or IPSec?  -> IPSec
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - all atenndes agrees with IPSec first step
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - IPSec is widely used so, this is big win to the community
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - IPSec can support remote user use case
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - SSL-VPN (CloudPipe) can be supported by OpenVPN VM with floating
>> >> >> ips
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2) GenricService API -> Agreed
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -id
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -name
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -tenant_id
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -type (VPN type)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> type has namespace (should be flat)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> l2 vpn -> l2.*** (l2.l2tp)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> l3 vpn -> l3.** (l3.ipsec)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 3) IPSec API set
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Start discussion for IPSec api on the google doc
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://docs.google.com/a/ntti3.com/document/d/1Jphcvnn7PKxqFEFFZQ1_PY
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> kEx5J4aO5J5Q74R_PwgV8/edit
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 4) Next meeting time
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> PST Monday 5PM (Sactin at VMWare will reserve conf-call)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Meeting Agenda and Note
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1J7k1eI13-3pQVwp5XgZDWPfzUvuSqc
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> zRdK0lEZKQOKk/edit#slide=id.p
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks!
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2013/5/1 Sachin Thakkar <sthakkar at vmware.com>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks folks for joining today. We've made some good progress on the
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> IPsec VPN object model. Nachi has sent out the meeting notes to the
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> alias as well.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We'll need another follow up to continue the discussion. The meeting
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> will be at 5pm Pacific time on Monday, May 6.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The same bridge below will be used.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sachin
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> From: "Sachin Thakkar" <sthakkar at vmware.com>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List
>> >> >> (openstack-dev at lists.openstack.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> org)"
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 11:43:30 PM
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] [Networking] VPNaaS
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Trying the new Networking tag in the subject :)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Anyway, we have a kickoff call for VPNaaS scheduled next Wednesday @
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 5pm Pacific time. We will be discussing over the phone:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Participant Passcode: 697 737 3510
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Call-in toll-free number (Premiere): 1-866-715-6501 (US) Additional
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> International Numbers:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://pages.pgi-email.com/page.aspx?qs=5c591a8916642e738e03c25585184
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> f841174bd68edc7b376f211065726f20c4087d2dbd294c95628953b9ebd93c298f8a5
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 9d287357f683bc937b0420662c826d43f873082e5033f476121c74d72cc5ed151c4b3
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 0a31fa1b2
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To all interested, hope to see you there.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sachin
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list