Open Stack

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>wrote:

> Wojciech Dec wrote:
> > What would be the duration of an electee's appointment? While option 3
> > sounds "about right", we likely want to avoid possible electoral
> tsunamis.
>
> The idea would be to keep the current setup: renew half the committee
> every 6 months (and be elected for a one-year term).
>
> That's where option (4) can become a bit complex, as every 6 months you
> need to make sure you have "enough PTLs" and PTLs being renewed every 6
> months.
>
> So I agree with Mark that option 4 may not be worth the added complexity
> and we should just use option 3, which is 10 times simpler to explain
> and implement in elections.
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
> Release Manager, OpenStack
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

I'd vote for option #3, but I'm also a big fan of the suggestion made by
Anne, there's still some details that we'd need to work out (particularly
to keep it from having the same scope problem that we have now), but
personally it makes the most sense to me in terms of a TC and it's purpose.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130115/b13d3a7b/attachment.html>