Open Stack

Sections are really nice if you have 1 config file with different things
that use the same option.

As in with Moniker we have a for example different Backends which are the
ways we handle DNS servers, some of these use different
"database_connection" settings for example. We also have others but it's
just to demonstrate the value of sections vs everything in DEFAULT.

See it here:
https://github.com/stackforge/moniker/blob/master/etc/moniker/moniker.conf.sample

Endre

2013/2/15 Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com>

> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 20:00 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > On 02/15/2013 07:07 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > > Usually, we avoid breaking existing configurations. But, in the case of
> > > hyper-v, I'd be fine with you guys saying "we did't have many users in
> > > Folsom, so backwards compat isn't a big concern".
> >
> > I would agree too, on this case only ... :)
> >
> > Please don't propose to move *other* directives around on new sections.
> > It's too late for that already.
>
> Already proposed and there was consensus that it was a good idea:
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/grizzly-nova-config-options
>
> We'll retain backwards compatibility support for at least a release,
> though.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130215/40c58f1b/attachment.html>