Open Stack

On 02/11/2013 12:44 PM, Chuck Short wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13-02-09 11:12 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>> On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 22:56 -0500, Eric Windisch wrote:
>>> As such, contributions are NOT under the Apache license, but are
>>> licensed under the CLA to the OpenStack Foundation and then relicensed
>>> by the foundation under the Apache license.
>> The CLAs' terms is very similar to the terms of the Apache License 2.0.
>> I basically think of the CLA as "I submit my contribution to OpenStack
>> under the terms of the Apache License 2.0". But IANAL
>>
>>>    As such, I'm not entitled to actually submit MIT licensed code into
>>> the project (which very well may be a good thing).
>> That is probably true, but I'm not 100% sure.
>>
>> IMHO, the question on 0.12.0 is to distro maintainers - how disruptive
>> is the requirement for 0.12.0 in Grizzly?
>
> Not disruptive at all.

Same here, openSUSE-12.2 ships 0.12.1 and was released September 5th, 
2012 already.

>
>>
>> If it is disruptive, we can punt on it until Havana and recommend to
>> folks they use 0.12.0 if they want to use the zmq driver.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>
> chuck
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


-- 
With kind regards,
Sascha Peilicke
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)