[openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Nova][API] Still need to update v2 API in Icehouse release

Jay Lau jay.lau.513 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 27 09:56:09 UTC 2013


Thanks Joe.

Still have another question, for which case shall we need to add new
extension to the v2 AP? If freeze the v2 api at icehouse-2, then does it
mean that we are not allowed to make any changes to v2 api? All api changes
should go to v3 directly, right?

Thanks,

Jay


2013/12/27 Joe Gordon <joe.gordon0 at gmail.com>

>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Jay Lau <jay.lau.513 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In Icehouse development, do we have some guidelines for nova api change?
>> If I want to make some changes for nova api, do I need to update both v2
>> and v3 or just v3?
>>
>
> For every new extension to the v2 API we require the equivalent change to
> the v3 api, so that there is nothing in v2 that V3 doesn't support. But
> requiring the opposite doesn't make any sense to me, and seems like a waste
> of human resources.
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-summit-nova-v3-api says we want
> to freeze the v2 api at icehouse-2, a plan which I full support.
>
>
>>
>> There are some patches related to this, hope can get some comments from
>> you.
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52733/
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52867/
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63853/
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jay
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131227/d39ee919/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list