[openstack-dev] [oslo][nova] oslo common.service vs. screen and devstack

Doug Hellmann doug.hellmann at dreamhost.com
Fri Dec 20 20:09:15 UTC 2013


On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:

> On 12/20/2013 10:56 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> > On 12/20/2013 09:59 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> > <snip>
> >> So as Clint said, SIGHUP is only appropriate to do that *if* the process
> >> is daemonized. If it's in the foreground it's not.
> >>
> >> So that logic needs to be better.
> >
> > This is basically a blocker for adding any upgrade testing from
> > something later than havana. Grenade upstream is still functioning
> > because the service code wasn't merged into nova until after havana was
> cut.
> >
> > However there is a desire to do more interesting upgrade patterns, and
> > without the ability to shutdown nova services on master in the gate,
> > that's going to hit us pretty hard.
> >
> > So I'd like to get this fixed soon. As digging us out of this later is
> > going to be way more expensive.
>
> Work around here for review - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63444/


That fix has landed in oslo, and I'm working on a patch to copy it into
nova now.

Doug



>
>
>         -Sean
>
> --
> Sean Dague
> Samsung Research America
> sean at dague.net / sean.dague at samsung.com
> http://dague.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131220/25263bb4/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list