[openstack-dev] [oslo][nova] oslo common.service vs. screen and devstack

Sean Dague sean at dague.net
Fri Dec 20 16:22:05 UTC 2013


On 12/20/2013 10:56 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 12/20/2013 09:59 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> <snip>
>> So as Clint said, SIGHUP is only appropriate to do that *if* the process
>> is daemonized. If it's in the foreground it's not.
>>
>> So that logic needs to be better.
> 
> This is basically a blocker for adding any upgrade testing from
> something later than havana. Grenade upstream is still functioning
> because the service code wasn't merged into nova until after havana was cut.
> 
> However there is a desire to do more interesting upgrade patterns, and
> without the ability to shutdown nova services on master in the gate,
> that's going to hit us pretty hard.
> 
> So I'd like to get this fixed soon. As digging us out of this later is
> going to be way more expensive.

Work around here for review - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63444/

	-Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
sean at dague.net / sean.dague at samsung.com
http://dague.net

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131220/f4b39cb0/attachment.pgp>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list