Open Stack

Hi Iwamoto,

You are correct. Provider attribute will remain in the pool due to API
compatibility reasons.

Thanks,
Eugene.


On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:35 AM, IWAMOTO Toshihiro <iwamoto at valinux.co.jp>wrote:

> At Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:25:54 +0900,
> Itsuro ODA wrote:
> >
> > Hi Eugene,
> >
> > Thank you for the response.
> >
> > I have a comment.
> > I think 'provider' attribute should be added to loadbalance resource
> > and used rather than pool's 'provider' since I think using multiple
> > driver within a loadbalancer does not make sense.
>
> There can be a 'provider' attribute in a loadbalancer resource, but,
> to maintain API, the 'provider' attribute in pools should remain the
> same.
> Is there any other attribute planned for the loadbalancer resource?
>
> > What do you think ?
> >
> > I'm looking forward to your code up !
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Itsuro Oda
> >
> > On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:58:40 +0400
> > Eugene Nikanorov <enikanorov at mirantis.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Itsuro,
> > >
> > > I've updated the wiki with some examples of cli workflow that
> illustrate
> > > proposed API.
> > > Please see the updated page:
> > >
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance#API_change
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Eugene.
>
> --
> IWAMOTO Toshihiro
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131202/773670fb/attachment.html>