[openstack-dev] [Neutron][VPNaaS] Supporting OpenSwan or StrongSwan or Both?
nachi at ntti3.com
Mon Aug 19 22:29:34 UTC 2013
Thank you for your comment.
I'm adding OpenSwan support as additional driver, so it is safe for strongswan.
2013/8/19 Salvatore Orlando <sorlando at nicira.com>:
> As I said during the meeting, I am happy to support both as long as the code
> churn is reasonably contained and the chances of strongswan support
> introducing bugs into openswan driver are negligible.
> Openswan should be the default solution, in muy opinion.
> On 20 August 2013 00:15, Nachi Ueno <nachi at ntti3.com> wrote:
>> Hi folks
>> I would like to discuss whether supporting OpenSwan or StrongSwan or Both
>> ipsec driver?
>> We choose StrongSwan because of the community is active and plenty of
>> However It looks like RHEL is only supporting OpenSwan.
>> so we should choose
>> (A) Support StrongSwan
>> (B) Support OpenSwan
>> (C) Support both
>> (C-1) Make StrongSwan default
>> (C-2) Make OpenSwan default
>> Actually, I'm working on C-2.
>> The patch is still WIP https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42264/
>> Besides the patch is small, supporting two driver may burden
>> in H3 including docs or additional help.
>> IMO, this is also a valid comment.
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
More information about the OpenStack-dev