Open Stack

No, we don't have any regular meetings yet.
Usually I hang at #quantum-lbaas where some discussions happen. (It's
almost not populated right now)

Thanks,
Eugene.


On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville) <
swaminathan.vasudevan at hp.com> wrote:

>  Hi Folks,****
>
> Do  you have an Lbaas meeting today.****
>
> If so what is the IRC channel.****
>
> Thanks****
>
> Swami****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:enikanorov at mirantis.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2013 9:24 AM
> *To:* Sumit Naiksatam
> *Cc:* OpenStack Development Mailing List; Salvatore Orlando; Youcef Laribi
>
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum][LBaaS] LBaaS development plan
> for Havana****
>
> ** **
>
> Sumit,****
>
> No, thanks for reminding! need to think how it will fit into the plan (at
> which step it would be easier to implement)****
>
> ** **
>
> Youcef, drivers are only vendor-specific in my diagram (both plugin-side
> drivers or agent-side drivers).****
>
> Device Inventory or scehduling don't belong to drivers, but drivers could
> rely on them.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Eugene.****
>
> ** **
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Sumit Naiksatam <sumitnaiksatam at gmail.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Hi Eugene,****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks. During the summit we discussed the notion of a logical
> loadbalancer/device which we later moved to calling a loadbalancer service
> instance (one or more tenant, as desired). Is this capture somewhere in the
> scheme of things?****
>
> ** **
>
> ~Sumit.****
>
> ** **
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Eugene Nikanorov <enikanorov at mirantis.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Hi folks,****
>
> ** **
>
> I've prepared a list of a major action items needed for futher development
> of multivendor and production-ready LBaaS:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Quantum/LBaaS/HavanaPlan****
>
> ** **
>
> I'd be glad to here your feedback about it. ****
>
> I think we need to start discussing these items in more details.****
>
> ** **
>
> Aside from this list I imply that vendors will create their drivers
> choosing whatever architecture is reasonable for their solution, while
> quantum provides convenient way of integrating them.****
>
> Also, as you can see, some of action items (like service insertion or
> device inventory) have scope beyond LBaaS so I expect folks who are
> interested in other services to participate in corresponding discussions.*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Eugene.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130425/15c0f5c9/attachment.html>