[openstack-dev] [Quantum][LBaaS] LBaaS development plan for Havana

Eugene Nikanorov enikanorov at mirantis.com
Thu Apr 25 16:23:40 UTC 2013

No, thanks for reminding! need to think how it will fit into the plan (at
which step it would be easier to implement)

Youcef, drivers are only vendor-specific in my diagram (both plugin-side
drivers or agent-side drivers).
Device Inventory or scehduling don't belong to drivers, but drivers could
rely on them.


On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Sumit Naiksatam
<sumitnaiksatam at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Eugene,
> Thanks. During the summit we discussed the notion of a logical
> loadbalancer/device which we later moved to calling a loadbalancer service
> instance (one or more tenant, as desired). Is this capture somewhere in the
> scheme of things?
> ~Sumit.
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Eugene Nikanorov <enikanorov at mirantis.com
> > wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> I've prepared a list of a major action items needed for futher
>> development of multivendor and production-ready LBaaS:
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Quantum/LBaaS/HavanaPlan
>> I'd be glad to here your feedback about it.
>> I think we need to start discussing these items in more details.
>> Aside from this list I imply that vendors will create their drivers
>> choosing whatever architecture is reasonable for their solution, while
>> quantum provides convenient way of integrating them.
>> Also, as you can see, some of action items (like service insertion or
>> device inventory) have scope beyond LBaaS so I expect folks who are
>> interested in other services to participate in corresponding discussions.
>> Thanks,
>> Eugene.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130425/ade82135/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list