On 04/23/2013 03:03 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Gary, > > #3 should be possible. Allow projects to use [DATABASE] instead of > [DEFAULT]. Can you please open a bug? I'll help. That would be great. Much appreciated - https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo/+bug/1171837 Please let me know when you have something I'll be happy to test and review. Thanks Gary > > -- dims > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Gary Kotton <gkotton at redhat.com > <mailto:gkotton at redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > We are in the process of adding the OSLO DB support to Quantum. > There are a number of issues here: > 1. The common DB code does not support foreign key constraints > with sqlite (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27320/) > 2. The common code does not have a database cleanup. This is > something that we use in the quantum automatic tests to try and > keep the memory footprint small > (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27322/) > 3. In the current Quantum versions all of the database > configuration information is under a section [DATABASE]. The > common code moves this to [DEFAULT]. If possible it would be great > if we could preserve the current configuration file settings. This > will enable us to have smoother version upgrades. If this is not > possible then we will need a migration script to update > configuration files. Does anyone have thoughts on this? I would > like to make changes to the common code to ensure that we can use > the DATABASE section. > Thanks > Gary > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130423/f23c3cb0/attachment.html>