On 09/04/2012 12:54 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote: > +1 > > How do we need to handle the migration reversal? > https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/common/sql/migrate_repo/versions/002_token_id_hash.py Just add another one on. I'm writing it as part of the patch. > > -Dolph > > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Adam Young <ayoung at redhat.com > <mailto:ayoung at redhat.com>> wrote: > > The PKI token change introduced an unnecessary change to the > database table for tokens. I'd like to revert it to the layout > that exists in Essex. To that end, I'd like to: > > 1. Remove the id_hash column > 2. Change the id column to sql.Column(sql.String(64), > primary_key=True) > 3. Stop persisting the PKI token body in the table. > > The changes to do this are minimal. Is this an acceptable change > to push through between now and the Folsom release? Including the > tokens and the extra columns in the database long term will likely > cause trouble. > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20120904/096fe9c5/attachment.html>