Open Stack

On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 11:53 +0800, unicell wrote:
Hi Folks,
> 
> In the review comments of my project-specific-flavor blueprint patch,
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11270/
> Kevin raised a question about response value for public flavor access list.
> And I'd like to posted here for discussion.
...
> # Retrieve public flavor access information
> stack at precise64:~$ nova flavor-access-list --flavor 1
> +-----------+-------------+
> | Flavor_ID | Tenant_ID   |
> +-----------+-------------+
> | 1         | ALL TENANTS |
> +-----------+-------------+
> 
> Question
> --
> For the default public flavor types, is this "ALL TENANTS" an acceptable
> solution?  It was intended to provide a human readable message for public
> flaovrs. And, to differentiate from a non-public flavor with no project
> access configured.

You're trying to model:

  1) A public flavor

  2) A private flavor associated with one or more tenants

  3) A private flavor not associated with any tenants

(2) and (3) can be modelled with a "list of tenants" property, but the
question is how to model (1) using only a list of tenants

I agree that "ALL TENANTS" isn't acceptable. The obvious solution I see
is either to expose the "is_public" property or return a 404 if the
client queries os-flavor-access on a non-private flavor.

Cheers,
Mark.