I would say the lack of XML support by default makes it half-baked. -George On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:33 PM, Paul McMillan <Paul.McMillan at Nebula.com> wrote: > On 08/16/2012 04:20 PM, Edgar Magana (eperdomo) wrote: >> So, is there any rush on having XML support for Folsom? I would say NO. >> I think we should carefully review what we are supporting for Folsom >> because it’s going to be our “debut” as core project and the last thing >> that we want is a service that offers a lot of features but with bugs. > > As Edgar said, it makes sense to add XML support when it's feature complete and stable, rather than rushing in a half-baked API which then must be supported. > > -Paul > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- George Reese (george.reese at imaginary.com) t: @GeorgeReese m: +1(207)956-0217 Skype: nspollution cal: http://tungle.me/GeorgeReese -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20120816/b0c6c98f/attachment.html>