Open Stack

> 
> Ideally we would like to use one common generic interface. Are you aware of the gaps that need to be addressed to ensure that the ZeroMQ can be instead of either rabbit or qpid?
Sure, and there obviously one common interface already. The main gap is that the ZeroMQ driver doesn't know who its peers are in a dynamic fashion. This is what the Matchmaker was to provide, but this work overlapped greatly with the ServiceGroup feature, so I'm waiting for that to land. The Rabbit/Qpid systems know all the peers because it is centralized, everyone knows where the central hub is and the central hub can communicate to all the consumers, making it dynamic and plug-and-play.

Regards,
Eric Windisch

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20120815/9e395161/attachment.html>