[openstack-dev] OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 4, Issue 61
Bill Shetti
billshetti at gmail.com
Tue Aug 14 23:24:58 UTC 2012
>
>
> I saw the note earlier on LBaaS (wiki) - its a great start for L4-7
But is there any traction and or pointers on the VPN capability?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:35:17 -0700
> From: Dan Wendlandt <dan at nicira.com>
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 4, Issue 26
> Message-ID:
> <CA+0XJm8xp=
> WgZ1H8qL7DagaWZ0eWdREiDa3D9YvLzWQLjrErYg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Bill Shetti <billshetti at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi see below
> > Bill
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:09:40 -0700
> >> From: Eugene Kirpichov <ekirpichov at gmail.com>
> >> To: openstack at lists.launchpad.net, OpenStack Development Mailing List
> >> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> >> Subject: [openstack-dev] LBaaS IRC meeting notes
> >> Message-ID:
> >> <
> >> CANVKUrWt0QOOVdamWWnm3V+9qd071CnzLZeb_mUoJTz7EcmLVg at mail.gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Below are the meeting notes from the IRC meeting about LBaaS which
> >> took place on Aug 2.
> >>
> >> The logs can be found at
> >>
> >>
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-08-02-17.00.log.html
> >> [19:18:27 .. 19:56:41]
> >>
> >> === Status on our side ===
> >> https://github.com/Mirantis/openstack-lbaas
> >> * HAproxy and ACE implemented to some level.
> >> * F5 to be finished in 6 weeks. By that time driver API will be stable.
> >> * Support for device capabilities (drivers report them, users request
> >> them) on its way to master.
> >>
> >> === Discussion with Dan Went of Quantum ===
> >> Dan said:
> >> * Quantum is moving up the stack: "L2 in essex, L3 in folsom, and in
> >> Grizzly we'll be moving into L4-L7"
> >>
> >
> >
> > Please clarify L4-7
> >
>
> Load-balancing is probably the most obvious example, but I think there will
> also be work on more advanced firewalling and likely VPN.
>
> dan
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >> * Many people in Quantum are generally interested in LBaaS
> >> * We need to make sure we're not duplicating effort by developing our
> >> own CLI/GUI for LBaaS. We should at least integrate with the Quantum
> >> CLI framework and generally collaborate with the Quantum community
> >> (circulate blueprints and POC).
> >>
> >> The next meeting will take place Aug 9, 19:00 UTC at #openstack-meeting.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Eugene Kirpichov
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekirpichov
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Dan Wendlandt
> Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
> twitter: danwendlandt
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20120812/71ed80bf/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:02:08 +0800
> From: Hua ZZ Zhang <zhuadl at cn.ibm.com>
> To: MURAOKA Yusuke <yusuke at jbking.org>
> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
> openstack-bounces+zhuadl=cn.ibm.com at lists.launchpad.net,
> netstack at lists.launchpad.net, openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Netstack] [Quantum]
> Multi-host implementation
> Message-ID:
> <
> OFE0BD348C.1BFA28EB-ON48257A59.0021FEF9-48257A59.0026B0E6 at cn.ibm.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
>
> hi,
>
> I have a question about the ip address consumed by the dhcp services. is it
> necessary to assign an individual ip for each dhcp daemon? can we reserve
> only one ip address for all dhcp deamons subject to one subnet since they
> won't run on the same host? since the dhcp service only need to
> communicate with local VM instances and local dhcp agent (don't know if it
> is true for this assumption), can we find a kind of isolation mechanism to
> avoid ip conflicts and extra consume of ip addresses to implement this
> feature?
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
> Edward Zhang(??) ??:???????????8? ???
> Staff Software Engineer ???28?? ????3? ???100193
> Travel&Transportation Standards Address: 3F Ring, Building 28
> Emerging Technology Institute(ETI) Zhongguancun Software Park, 8
> IBM China Software Development Lab Dongbeiwang West Road, Haidian
> e-mail: zhuadl at cn.ibm.com District, Beijing, P.R.C.100193
> Notes ID: Hua ZZ Zhang/China/IBM
> Tel: 86-10-82450483
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> MURAOKA Yusuke
> <yusuke at jbking.or
> g> To
> Sent by: Dan Wendlandt <dan at nicira.com>
> openstack-bounces cc
> +zhuadl=cn.ibm.co OpenStack Development Mailing List
> m at lists.launchpad <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> .net , netstack at lists.launchpad.net,
> openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Subject
> 2012-08-09 00:19 Re: [Openstack] [Netstack]
> [openstack-dev] [Quantum]
> Multi-host implementation
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've updated the bp to correspond with current design spec.
> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-multihost-dhcp
>
>
> I'd know the case of failure, improper, insane, by that.
> Anyway, comments, discussions are welcome.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> MURAOKA Yusuke
>
> Mail: yusuke at jbking.org
>
>
> ???2012?8?7????????2:47?????Nachi Ueno?
>
> > Hi Dan
> >
> > Thank you for pointing this.
> >
> > Yusuke updated design spec.
> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-multihost-dhcp
> >
> > 2012/8/6 Dan Wendlandt <dan at nicira.com (mailto:dan at nicira.com)>:
> > > Hi Nachi,
> > >
> > > I've reviewed the code and added comments. I'd like to see at least a
> basic
> > > spec describing the proposed approach (need only be a couple
> paragraphs,
> > > perhaps with a diagram) linked to the blueprint so we can have a design
> > > discussion around it. Thanks,
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Nachi Ueno <nachi at nttmcl.com (
> mailto:nachi at nttmcl.com)> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi folks
> > > >
> > > > Sorry.
> > > > I added openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org (
> mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org) in this discussion.
> > > >
> > > > 2012/8/3 Nati Ueno <nati.ueno at gmail.com (mailto:nati.ueno at gmail.com
> )>:
> > > > > Hi folks
> > > > >
> > > > > > Gary
> > > > > Thank you for your comment. I wanna discuss your point on the
> mailing
> > > > > list.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yusuke pushed Multi-host implementation for review.
> > > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10766/2
> > > > > This patch changes only quantum-dhcp-agent side.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary's point is we should have host attribute on the port for
> > > > > scheduling.
> > > > > I agree with Gary.
> > > > >
> > > > > In the nova, vm has available_zone for scheduling.
> > > > > So Instead of using host properties.
> > > > > How about use available_zone for port?
> > > > >
> > > > > Format of availability_zone is something like this
> > > > > available_zone="zone_name:host".
> > > > >
> > > > > We can also add availability_zone attribute for the network as a
> > > > > default value of port.
> > > > > We can write this until next Monday.
> > > > > However I'm not sure quantum community will accept this or not, so
> I'm
> > > > > asking here.
> > > > >
> > > > > If there are no objections, we will push zone version for review.
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Nachi
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > > > > Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net (
> mailto:openstack at lists.launchpad.net)
> > > > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > > > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > > > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org (
> mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org)
> > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > Dan Wendlandt
> > > Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com (http://www.nicira.com)
> > > twitter: danwendlandt
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack
> > > Post to : netstack at lists.launchpad.net (
> mailto:netstack at lists.launchpad.net)
> > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack
> > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net (
> mailto:openstack at lists.launchpad.net)
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20120813/789dec3c/attachment.html
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: 17312346.gif
> Type: image/gif
> Size: 1279 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20120813/789dec3c/attachment.gif
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: ecblank.gif
> Type: image/gif
> Size: 45 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20120813/789dec3c/attachment-0001.gif
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: graycol.gif
> Type: image/gif
> Size: 105 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20120813/789dec3c/attachment-0002.gif
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: pic04733.gif
> Type: image/gif
> Size: 1255 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20120813/789dec3c/attachment-0003.gif
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> End of OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 4, Issue 61
> ********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20120814/bfc2a4ce/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list
