Open Stack

Specifically, I would like to use the following puppet module:

https://github.com/purpleidea/puppet-ipa/

to optionally enroll an undercloud node in a triple-O deployment to a
FreeIPA server.  This would likely involve changes to tripleo/instack-
undercloud.

Overcloud nodes would be enrolled using a different mechanism. 
(https://github.com/rcritten/novajoin)

Is it acceptable in this case?

Thanks,
Ade


On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 13:58 -0600, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 11/09/2016 01:51 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Just a quick question:
> > 
> > Is AGPLv3+ an acceptable license for a third party library that is
> > a
> > dependency for an Openstack project?
> > 
> > I read: 
> > (from http://governance.openstack.org/reference/licensing.html)
> > 
> > In order to be acceptable as dependencies of OpenStack projects,
> > external libraries (produced and published by 3rd-party developers)
> > must be licensed under an OSI-approved license that does not
> > restrict
> > distribution of the consuming project. The list of acceptable
> > licenses
> > includes ASLv2, BSD (both forms), MIT, PSF, LGPL, ISC, and MPL.
> > Licenses considered incompatible with this requirement include
> > GPLv2,
> > GPLv3, and AGPL.
> > 
> > Is AGPL the same as AGPLv3 (and therefore not acceptable)?
> 
> Yes, AGPL and AGPLv3 fall into the same category.
> 
> However, depending on what you want to do it may be ok (there are
> circumstances where it's acceptable and circumstances where it isn't)
> so
> if you have a specific library in mind and a specific use, it might
> be
> worthwhile asking anyway.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> legal-discuss mailing list
> legal-discuss at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-discuss