[Interop-wg] [interop-challenge] Workload Results

Tong Li litong01 at us.ibm.com
Thu May 4 17:57:51 UTC 2017


thanks Daniel, please everybody else sent their results to the mailing
list.

Tong Li
IBM Open Technology
Building 501/B205
litong01 at us.ibm.com



From:	Daniel Mellado <dmellado at redhat.com>
To:	interop-wg at lists.openstack.org
Cc:	Victoria Martinez de la Cruz <vkmc at redhat.com>, Russell Bryant
            <rbryant at redhat.com>
Date:	05/04/2017 01:31 PM
Subject:	[Interop-wg] [interop-challenge] Workload Results



Hi everyone, as we agreed during the last meeting please find here my
workload results.

1.) Your name: Daniel
Mellado




2.) Your email:
dmellado at redhat.com




3.) Reporting on behalf of Company/Organization: Red Hat,
Inc.




4.) Name and version (if applicable) of the product you
tested:


    Red Hat OpenStack Platform
10




5.) Version of OpenStack the product uses:
Newton




6.) Link to RefStack results for this
product:



https://refstack.openstack.org/#/results/92ebe5cd-c67f-42d6-abac-1b483dfb976c




7.) Workload 1, Phase 1: K8s with Ansible/Shade
(
https://github.com/openstack/interop-workloads/tree/master/workloads/ansible/shade/k8s
)

  A.) Did the workload run successfully?
Yes


  B.) If not, did you encounter any end-user visible error messages?
N/A


  C.) Were you able to determine why the workload failed on this
product?
N/A


  D.) (optional) In your estimation, how hard would it be to modify
this


  workload to get it running on this product?  Can you describe what
would
need


  to be
done?




  There are a few tweaks and additions that would've been great, but
were
left


  out because lack of
time.



i.e.


  - CentOS support as host:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/457199/


  - Ansible performance tuning:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/462508/


  - Add more tox
environments


  -
...


  Just to name a few, but it wouldn't be that hard to add these if
needed.




8.) Workload 1, Phase 2: Multicloud K8s/cockroachdb
(
https://github.com/openstack/interop-workloads/commit/f4550640669fa90c5f05b48b7afcf322f7f15313
)

  A.) Did the workload run successfully?
Yes


  B.) If not, did you encounter any end-user visible error messages?
N/A


  C.) Were you able to determine why the workload failed on this
product?
N/A


  D.) (optional) In your estimation, how hard would it be to modify
this


  workload to get it running on this product?  Can you describe what
would
need


  to be done? N/A

As per time to run the workload, I wanted to summarize it too.

Phase 1: 0:07:14.810 **********

Phase 2: 0:00:17.169 **********



Best and looking forward to meet you next week!

Daniel


[attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Tong Li/Raleigh/IBM]
_______________________________________________
Interop-wg mailing list
Interop-wg at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/interop-wg


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/interop-wg/attachments/20170504/466b81d4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/interop-wg/attachments/20170504/466b81d4/attachment-0001.gif>


More information about the Interop-wg mailing list