Open Stack

Josep - Thanks for your feedback. Our plan is to merge the ISV subgroup with the larger Application Enablement working group. Until then, I agree, we should use the User Committee ML for communications regarding this team too.

Shamail: Any update on merging the teams? Any issues using the User-Committee ML until that is complete?
Thanks
Carol

From: BLANCH at clinic.cat [mailto:BLANCH at clinic.cat]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 9:56 AM
To: enterprise-wg at lists.openstack.org; Barrett, Carol L <carol.l.barrett at intel.com>
Subject: Enterprise-wg list discontinuation

Hi Carol,


For me it is OK to mix the Enterprise-wg with the User-Comitee-wg, as you mentioned in your message dated at Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:16:30 +0000, as long as we receive the same information from the user-comitee-wg than from the enterprise-wg. Specially the one concerning the ISV subgroup

Looking at past issues of the Enterprise-wg, I found especially interesting the ones on the ISV subgroup

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Enterprise-Business-ISV-Archive

It has provided us with very valuable hints to help evaluate where openstack is going, in terms of the industry acceptation

For me, it is specially relevant all the comments on the SAP moves concerning Openstack:

*         SAP is very important for us, as well as for all the SMBs that use SAP as do ourselves

*         Openstack seems a good choice for SAP to provide even more controlled and reliable on premise deployments

At Hospital Clinic, We did accept linux as a production ready enterprise solution, when SAP did certify the SUSE Linux platform. Maybe the same would occur with openstack

Best regards


Josep Blanch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/enterprise-wg/attachments/20161128/e8b34979/attachment.html>