[Win The Enterprise-wg] Enterprise-wg Digest, Vol 1, Issue 2

Kenneth Hui kenhuinyc at gmail.com
Wed Aug 13 13:20:38 UTC 2014


All,

My suggestion is to focus on a single topic such as the "pets vs cattle "
discussion.  My suggestion is based on the fact that the proposed session
is fairly short and it would be difficult a subject such as blueprints that
could cover many subjects.  So we may be more productive by focusing on a
single item for discussion and then reserve a half day or series of shorter
sessions to cover various potential blueprints.  The topic of reference
architectures can also take some time given the number of potential use
cases.

Unfortunately, I won't be able to attend since this is the same week as
VMworld.  BTW, I would suggest avoiding holding Operator Summits that
conflicts with future VMworlds.  Otherwise, I think we will be limiting
participation by enterprise customers since many of the folks being
assigned to OpenStack are also VMware administrators.

Thank you.


-- 
Kenneth Hui

347.997.0935
kenhuinyc at gmail.com <kkanghui at gmail.com>




On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:00 AM, <enterprise-wg-request at lists.openstack.org>
wrote:

> Send Enterprise-wg mailing list submissions to
>         enterprise-wg at lists.openstack.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/enterprise-wg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         enterprise-wg-request at lists.openstack.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         enterprise-wg-owner at lists.openstack.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Enterprise-wg digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. San Antonio Operators Meetup Opportunity (Barrett, Carol L)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:25:22 +0000
> From: "Barrett, Carol L" <carol.l.barrett at intel.com>
> To: "enterprise-wg at lists.openstack.org"
>         <enterprise-wg at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [Win The Enterprise-wg] San Antonio Operators Meetup
>         Opportunity
> Message-ID:
>         <
> 2D352D0CD819F64F9715B1B89695400D5C4B7DB6 at ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Team - On August 25 and 26th Rackspace is hosting an Operators Meetup.
>  This event gives people who run clouds a place to congregate, swap best
> practices, ideas and give feedback. It will have a round
> table/working/discussion session feel, with only a small number of
> presentations. The goals for this event are:
> 1.      Gather feedback on the issues that come up in running OpenStack
> and work to communicate this throughout the community
> 2.      Create a forum in which to share best practices and architectures
> between interested parties
> 3.      Increase constructive, proactive involvement from those running
> clouds
>
>
> We've been offered a discussion slot on 8/25 to sit down with a subset of
> the Operators and engage them to help us on the next steps we've identified
> to help us better focus our efforts or be better prepared for Paris. I'd
> like to get your thoughts on how we could use this time. Here are a couple
> of thoughts:
> 1)      Pets vs Cattle: There's a team working to develop a model to
> change the dynamics around this topic and create an actionable approach to
> planning for deploying all types of workloads in an OpenStack cloud
> environment. We could test our model and approach to applying it to
> different workloads and ask the Operators to help us. We would use this
> information to shape the content in the session in the Enterprise IT
> Strategy track in Paris.
> 2)      There are Blueprints being drafted to address some of the
> identified gaps. We could use this session to gain feedback and help in
> focusing and refining Blueprints.
> 3)      Reference Architectures & Documentation: We could use this session
> to better define the set of reference architectures that would be most
> helpful for Operators. Get feedback on the 3rd party toolset we're thinking
> of covering. Also, could recruit Operators who would be willing to work
> with us on a reference architecture or white paper on their deployment.
>
> I'm also interested in knowing if you are planning or would be interested
> in attending the Meetup and participating in our session.
>
> Thanks,
> Carol
>
> Links to more information:
> Tentative Schedule:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1p7gCZcLhmYnMC_Ab2N23Nndy3pAnTmtvpBvcvaOZb0Q
> Further details about sessions can be found on our planning etherpad:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SAT-ops-meetup
> Registration:
> https://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-ops-mid-cycle-meetup-tickets-12149171499
> Car Pool: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SAT-ops-meetup-car-pool
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/enterprise-wg/attachments/20140812/81d26377/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Enterprise-wg mailing list
> Enterprise-wg at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/enterprise-wg
>
>
> End of Enterprise-wg Digest, Vol 1, Issue 2
> *******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/enterprise-wg/attachments/20140813/eeffb68d/attachment.html>


More information about the Enterprise-wg mailing list