<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<style type="text/css">.mceResizeHandle {position: absolute;border: 1px solid black;background: #FFF;width: 5px;height: 5px;z-index: 10000}.mceResizeHandle:hover {background: #000}img[data-mce-selected] {outline: 1px solid black}img.mceClonedResizable, table.mceClonedResizable {position: absolute;outline: 1px dashed black;opacity: .5;z-index: 10000}
</style>
</head><body style="">
<div>
<span style="font-size: 9pt;">> </span>
</div>
<div>
> It looks like most of the things on the diagram listed as part of the “Compute” program are actually managed by several different programs as defined by the TC [1]. We’re discussing dropping the use of the word “programs” for teams [2], but I still think the difference in the two uses is going to be potentially confusing.
<br />>
<br />
<br />
</div>
<div>
I'll defer to the Foundation here. We did discuss this exact point and it's important to understand that the Foundation _already_ uses programs in the way that's outlined here.
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
One option would be to have capabilities that are platform only. That would address Rocky's concern about Identity being added.
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Great questions!
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
How about this?
</div>
<div>
</div>
</body></html>