Open Stack

Igor,
    I think at present, the challenge is that not many cloud enable HEAT,
so few has Murano installed. I will put this item on the agenda when we
have the regular Wednesday meeting. We can discuss this and you are welcome
to participate. The meeting will be at 10:00am EDT @ openstack-meeting-cp.
Here is the wiki page if you want to get more detailed information and all
past meeting logs.

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Interop_Challenge

Thanks.

Tong Li
IBM Open Technology
Building 501/B205
litong01 at us.ibm.com



From:	Igor Marnat <imarnat at mirantis.com>
To:	user-committee <user-committee at lists.openstack.org>,
            "defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org"
            <defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org>
Cc:	Stefano Maffulli <stefano at openstack.org>, Tong
            Li/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
Date:	09/21/2016 05:14 AM
Subject:	Re: [User-committee] [OpenStack-DefCore] [interop] Looking for
            participants in the Interop Challenge for Barcelona



Rochelle, colleagues,
I didn't follow this discussion from the very beginning, so I probably miss
something, but did you, folks, consider Murano apps in addition to
Terraform, Heat and Ansible? There are apps ready to be executed in
Community App Catalog, almost all the areas you mentioned are already
covered.

Anyone can just get them from the catalog and deploy them in their cloud.
Cloud interoperability is one of the key features of Murano Apps:

LAMP Stack:
http://apps.openstack.org/#tab=murano-apps&asset=WordPress

NFV:
http://apps.openstack.org/#tab=murano-apps&asset=Clearwater%20demo

Docker SWARM:
there is no Docker SWARM in the catalog, but there is Kubernetes Cluster
App:
http://apps.openstack.org/#tab=murano-apps&asset=Kubernetes%20Cluster

This page describes how to use apps from the catalog:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/App-Catalog. You are always welcome with
any questions to mailing lists, IRC #murano or #murano-apps on freenode.

Is there any particular reason not to consider Murano here I don't know of?


Regards,
Igor Marnat

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Tong Li <litong01 at us.ibm.com> wrote:
  Stefano, if you are using the latest script (as of 9/10), when you do not
  have tenant network, leave that parameter empty. Also, the public network
  parameter is actually not used. If you can, you can fix the configuration
  files in vars, and README file. Happy to know that the script actually
  produced the right results. Did you run the docker one? Same deal with
  tenant (private) network and public network if you use the ansible
  script.

  Thanks.

  Tong Li
  IBM Open Technology
  Building 501/B205
  litong01 at us.ibm.com

  Inactive hide details for Stefano Maffulli ---09/20/2016 08:25:13 PM---On
  09/19/2016 12:51 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote: > I agree, Stefano Maffulli
  ---09/20/2016 08:25:13 PM---On 09/19/2016 12:51 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote:
  > I agree, the ideal result would be to run these playb

  From: Stefano Maffulli <stefano at openstack.org>
  To: Shamail Tahir <itzshamail at gmail.com>, Anne Gentle <
  annegentle at justwriteclick.com>
  Cc: "defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org" <
  defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org>, user-committee <
  user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
  Date: 09/20/2016 08:25 PM
  Subject: Re: [OpenStack-DefCore] [interop] Looking for participants in
  the Interop Challenge for Barcelona



  On 09/19/2016 12:51 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote:
  > I agree, the ideal result would be to run these playbooks without
  > modification on multiple clouds but that probably isn't realistic.  The
  > team is encouraging people to modify the scripts (if/when needed) but
  to
  > document what needed to change so that we can eventually have a list of
  > topics that can be discussed and we can build next steps around.  I
  > guess the goal, in my opinion, for this initial iteration of the
  > challenge would be to run the same workload with the least amount of
  > modifications as possible and document areas that caused deviation.
  > This might also help identify/define the "knobs" as Anne mentioned in
  > her response.

  From my side, the first nob I noticed is the lack of private network for
  a normal customer. By using public on both public_network and
  private_network and another couple of hacks I completed a run of the
  LAMP ansible on DreamHost. I didn't change any of the security groups,
  so I'm not sure the servers are 'safe' this way but ... hey, here it is:

  http://208.113.133.137/

  I'll send a patch with the vars/dreamhost.yml file to osops-contrib,
  once we change the default username for the Ubuntu images (so we don't
  have to modify the 'ubuntu' username on site.yml.

  Cheers,
  stef



  _______________________________________________
  Defcore-committee mailing list
  Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
  http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee





  _______________________________________________
  User-committee mailing list
  User-committee at lists.openstack.org
  http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/defcore-committee/attachments/20160921/567f4d12/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/defcore-committee/attachments/20160921/567f4d12/attachment.gif>