Open Stack

On 11/11/16, Tong Li <litong01 at us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Chris,
>    Thanks so much for doing this important work. Please let me know what I
> can do to help. If we do have a new repository, I will be very happy to
> move all the stuff we have in contrib repository over to the new one. We
> can also structure the entire directory a bit better. We can talk about all
> these things on coming Wednesday meeting. Chris, can you come to the
> Wednesday meeting UTC 1500 at
> http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting-cp

I'm glad to hear there's support for this :)  I should be able to make
that meeting next week, look forward to coordinating next steps.

-Christopher

>
> Thanks.
>
> Tong Li
> IBM Open Technology
> Building 501/B205
> litong01 at us.ibm.com
>
>
>
> From:	Rochelle Grober <rochelle.grober at huawei.com>
> To:	Christopher Aedo <doc at aedo.net>, Caleb Boylan
>             <caleb.boylan at dreamhost.com>
> Cc:	defcore-committee <defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org>
> Date:	11/10/2016 08:17 PM
> Subject:	Re: [OpenStack-DefCore] [Interop] New Repository
>
>
>
> Sounds like a plan to me :-)
>
> Tong Li is critical for Core for this repo at the moment.  But it would be
> good to have someone else who could also actively track and review
> additions/changes, etc.
>
> I also think we might consider planning a "third party CI" type account or
> something so that when changes go in, all the interop vendors can
> automatically verify they haven't been broken.
>
> I'd love to see this happen.
>
> Might be able to put a cycle or two into it.
>
> --Rocky
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Aedo [mailto:doc at aedo.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:18 AM
> To: Caleb Boylan
> Cc: defcore-committee
> Subject: Re: [OpenStack-DefCore] [Interop] New Repository
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Caleb Boylan <caleb.boylan at dreamhost.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Great to see you all in Barcelona, the demo during the keynotes was
>> great! I think it would be great to get the playbooks and scripts into
>> the hand of end users that are using OpenStack clouds. There has been
>> talk of moving the Interop stuff into a separate repository (from the
>> osops-tools-contrib repository). I think this would be beneficial as
>> it is less confusing than having it in the same repository as other
>> scripts that are for operators instead of end users. What should this
>> repository be named and under what project should the repository
>> exist?
>
> I've heard some of the conversations around this as well, and I do
> agree a different repository seems reasonable.
>
> The question of who the reviewers will be is a pretty important one in
> my opinion and that also that impacts which project it would be best
> to sit under.  I'm inclined to suggest we make it part of the
> Community App Catalog project because it's related, and longer term we
> would like to play a big role in building a community of application
> reviewers.
>
> I guess that means I'm volunteering to help with this and will be
> happy if this repo is associated with the Community App Catalog
> project.
>
> -Christopher
>
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Caleb
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Defcore-committee mailing list
>> Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>
> _______________________________________________
> Defcore-committee mailing list
> Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>
> _______________________________________________
> Defcore-committee mailing list
> Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>
>
>
>