Open Stack

> On Dec 6, 2016, at 6:02 PM, Egle Sigler <ushnishtha at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Luz,
> 
> Thank you for working on this! I think "OpenStack Interoperability Guidelines”

Likewise.  I also like the idea of providing a UI hint (a label, bold text, something) to make these a bit more distinct in the interface.


> or just "Interoperability Guidelines" would work, but I am also interested to hear what others think.

Another thought: the Guidelines the Interop WG produces ultimately determine a product’s eligibility for the OpenStack Powered (TM) programs.  We could refer to them as “OpenStack Powered (TM) Guidelines” which would help folks be clear on the relationship between the two.  

At Your Service,

Mark T. Voelker

> 
> Thank you,
> Egle
> 
> 
> From: Cazares, Luz <luz.cazares at intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 12:43 PM
> To: defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: [OpenStack-DefCore] Interop - Guideline Rename Workstream
>  
> Hello Everyone,
>  
> As part of our rename work stream, we need a standard way to refer to the guidelines provided by this group.
>  
> As we discussed in our last meeting [1]. “DefCore Guidelines” was a very specific name pointing to the guidelines from this group... so we need something at this level with the new name (not open to interpretation).
> Some ideas:
> ·         OpenStack Interop Guidelines
> ·         Interoperability Guidelines
> ·         Interop WG Guidelines
> ·         Add label “Oficial” to differentiate our guideline from any other custom interop guideline.
>  
> Please let me know your comments, concerns or any question (if any).
>  
> [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/defcore/2016/defcore.2016-11-30-16.00.log.txt
>  
> Thanks, Regards
> Luz Cazares
> _______________________________________________
> Defcore-committee mailing list
> Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee