Open Stack

Jim,

I did have discussions around LSB with people in the community who were
concerned that we'd "fail like LSB."

My understanding is that LSB is more focused on patterns and conventions
around Linux.  DefCore took a more test focused approach that allows
users to validate vendor compliance.  User self-validation and reporting
is a key component for DefCore.

In both cases, success requires users to demand compliance from the
vendors.  I don't think you can govern from the Foundation alone.

Rob

On 11/02/2015 01:35 PM, Chris Hoge wrote:
>
> If we do DefCore correctly, it will become a boring standard that
> is easy to enforce because it is easy to deploy upstream while
> tracking how the needs of the community is expressed through the
> evolving APIs (which themselves take time to be successfully
> deployed and adopted).
>

-- 
  

Rob
____________________________
Rob Hirschfeld, 512-773-7522
RackN CEO, Founder

I am in CENTRAL (-6) time
http://robhirschfeld.com
twitter: @zehicle, github: cloudedge & ravolt 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/defcore-committee/attachments/20151102/35a179ae/attachment.html>