Open Stack

Hello Van,

The reason why compute-servers-metadata does not exist in havanacore is
because this capability was merged into the computer-servers capability
(please see the "Proposed Final Naming/Mapping" tab in http://goo.gl/AwaJYU
).  All compute-servers-metadata related tests were, in fact, included in
the compute-servers capability and are classified as "core" tests in the
havancore.json.

Catherine Cuong Diep
High Performance On Demand Solutions
IBM Silicon Valley Laboratory, San Jose, California 95141
cdiep at us.ibm.com, Tel: (408) 463-4352  T/L: 543-4352

>>>> On Feb 25, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Van Lindberg
>>>> <van.lindberg at rackspace.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Should we forward this on to the board?
>>>>
>>>> From: Van Lindberg <van.lindberg at rackspace.com> Date:
>>>> Wednesday, February 25, 2015 at 1:51 PM To:
>>>> "defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org"
>>>> <defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org> Cc: Egle Sigler
>>>> <egle.sigler at rackspace.com>, Adrian Otto
>>>> <adrian.otto at rackspace.com> Subject: [OpenStack-DefCore]
>>>> Draft 2015.03 Spec
>>>>
>>>> Hello all
>>>>
>>>> Per the discussion today and at the face to face meeting last
>>>> week, we have the following draft 2015.03 spec for comments
>>>> and approval:
>>>>
>>>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/defcore-draft-spec-2015.03
>>>>
>>>> Notes: - There are two advisory sections: auth-token (which
>>>> we created a placeholder for) and compute-servers-metadata
>>>> (which didn’t exist in havanacore, but was in icehousecore).
>>>> Because the point of this doc is “havanacore - anything
>>>> possibly troublesome,” we suggested moving
>>>> compute-servers-metadata to advisory for action in 2015.04. -
>>>> This is .rst formatted and designed for human consumption.
>>>> There is a linked (and also authoritative) .json file for
>>>> machine consumption. - The .json file (draft in gdoc for easy
>>>> multi-editing right now) has everything that is not mandatory
>>>> or advisory removed. - We updated the versioning of the .json
>>>> file (to 1.1), removed “status” from the top-level, and added
>>>> “advisory” flags for those two items that were advisory. We
>>>> also updated “core” to false for the two advisory items. - We
>>>> need designated sections for keystone.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Van
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Defcore-committee mailing list
>>>> Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>>>
>>>
>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> Defcore-committee mailing list
>>> Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>
>>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Defcore-committee
> mailing list Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>


_______________________________________________
Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=yHhx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/defcore-committee/attachments/20150227/3859ee11/attachment.html>