Open Stack

Good point. I think we could either change the “Community Building” track to simply be “Community” and expand the scope and # of sessions to cover Governance, or we could add another small track for “Community Governance.”

Thoughts?


> On Feb 10, 2015, at 2:51 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
> 
> Chris Hoge wrote:
>> That’s a tough one. At first glance I’d say “Planning your OpenStack
>> Project”, “Community Building,” or “Public and Hybrid Clouds”. My
>> favorite is "Community Building”.
>> 
>> For the Tempest and Interop talk I submitted it to Operations.
> 
> Right, there seems to be no track for OpenStack governance / project
> management / technical debt reduction... strategic initiatives that we
> put in place to fix critical structural issues. I have a talk about the
> new project structure, and there is nowhere to file it either. I ended
> up adding it to "Planning your OpenStack project" but that's clearly not
> ideal.
> 
> -- 
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Defcore-committee mailing list
> Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee