Open Stack

Thanks Rob - looking forward to seeing what we can get down :)

Regards,

Tom

On 12/09/14 10:01, Rob_Hirschfeld at Dell.com wrote:
> Tom,
> 
>  
> 
> I’ll have to ask individuals to come forward to restate this position –
> many of the cases were 1x1 dialogs or during meetings related to
> OpenStack.   At recent meetings Dell, SUSE, Piston, IBM and DreamHost
> have all made these statements.  I could name others; however, we really
> need people to represent their own positions where possible.
> 
> Regarding designated sections justification, we are moving that into a
> Gerrit process to make it easier to track the feedback.  Until then, we
> will have to accept the amount of community documentation generated in
> the etherpad.  I’m happy to entertain suggestions to delay the process
> while we collect additional feedback, but those would have to come from
> you or others.
> 
> For both Swift and Keystone, we need the PTLs and technical community to
> create more information for discussion.  Since we’re only worried about
> Havana at this stage, there is time to fill in the blanks for future
> releases.
> 
> Finally, I feel obliged to point out that some people who come to me are
> afraid to state these positions publicly because they see they the
> aggressive treatment that is given to people who voice alternate
> perspectives.  You can choose to discount me as a reporter of these
> perspectives; however, we need to acknowledge that people will not be
> willing to speak up until we welcome all views.
> 
> Rob
> 
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tom Fifield [mailto:tom at openstack.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 7:46 PM
>> To: defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [OpenStack-DefCore] Results from Community Meetings >
>> discussion/+1 about reconsidering Havana Swift as a core capability
>>
>> On 12/09/14 04:35, Rob_Hirschfeld at Dell.com wrote:
>> > I have gotten significant and consistent feedback that the two Swift
>> > capabilities should not be included in Havana Core. This has come
>> > from multiple sources, a variety of interests, and different reasons
>> > were given.
>>
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Following up from our discussion during the recent community meeting,
>> is this feedback written down anywhere? I cannot find it and would
>> suggest that the justifications being shared with the community.
>>
>> This is also related to the two action items proposed that we both
>> agreed were important to fulfil as soon as possible:
>>
>>
>> Action item: the difference between Havana and Juno that would
>> facilitate the change in designated/non-designated swift should be
>> specified in some degree of technical detail. (Potentially from Simon
>> Anderson)
>>
>> Action item: the problems with Keystone in Havana should be specified
>> in some degree of technical detail
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Defcore-committee mailing list
>> Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>